Wednesday 29 June 2011

Dominance and Abuse


Dominance and Abuse


I’m writing this post because on one of my three yahoo groups there’s been a lively discussion going on between one of my female members and some of the men. Basically she’s pretty much advocating what’s called the “loving SM” or “consensual submission” type of approach while some of the doms on there are accusing her of being a feminist out to wreck the group.
Anyone who wants to read the messages in full can see them on the yahoo group, “A Woman’s True Place.” The url is
Here’s the basic issue. She says that being a female submissive doesn’t mean you have to be a doormat and that being a male dominant doesn’t give you the right to treat girls like shit.
Now as it happens I’ve got some pretty wild and extreme views on what a man can or can’t do to a girl. I’ve openly posted my opinion that if a female gets raped it’s always her fault. I’d go so far as to say that a girl never has the “right” to refuse a man sex if he wants to fuck her. I’d also say that if she does refuse and gets “raped” by him then she is the one who should be punished and not him. He has done nothing wrong and the only one who’s behaved badly is the girl!
Frankly, I think rape should be legalised completely; it’s a victimless crime, after all.
I also believe that “domestic violence” should be legalised as well because a husband, partner or boyfriend does IMO have the right to impose discipline upon a girl who’s behaving badly, disobediently, disrespectfully and so on. “Domestic violence” in those sort of circumstances isn’t “abuse;” it’s just well-deserved domestic discipline.
Does that mean that a man can’t respect a girl? No, it doesn’t.
Does it mean that he shouldn’t respect her? No, it doesn’t.
Does it mean that he should treat her with contempt? No, it doesn’t.
Does it mean she’s a piece of shit? No, it doesn’t.
Personally I very much enjoy verbal abuse, physical degradation and a bit of handy violence.
That’s me and it doesn’t mean it has to be the same for everyone.
For what it’s worth my husband does love and respect me.
I’m very glad that he does.
Is it wrong for a dom to treat a sub as if she’s nothing?
I don’t think it’s right or wrong in the abstract; it all depends on the individual and their relationship together.
For some subs, being used like a piece of meat is heaven on earth.
For others, it’s hell.
I’m in between; I can go with the flow and enjoy either situation.
Anyway, I’d be very interested to hear other people’s thoughts, especially the gentlemen’s opinions.
In the meantime here’s a list of my sites:
http://bornfemale.proboards.com/index.cgi?
http://theparadiseislands.blogspot.com/





Tuesday 14 June 2011

I'm all mixed-up at times, I know

OK, I know a lot of people think I'm a total fruitcake.

Some even think I'm really a man pretending to be a woman.

I know one of my great heroes Faye Kane has the same problem!

Well, everyone, I'm NOT a man.

I'm a woman.

I'm a submissive woman.

To be honest, I quite like being that way.

I don't think being submissive makes me a doormat though of course it does mean that I defer to my boss - my husband - and to men in general because that's how I am.

Even when I was a teenager and in lesbian relationships I was always the submissive, feminine one.

As the Eartha Kitt song goes, "I adore being a girl."

A lot of my life is of course fantasy and role play - mainly with my hubby or online - though I've also had a few other people involved from time to time.

In my stories I can let myself go and explore the dark fantasies that fascinate me.

I was raped when I was 18 years old and it left a lasting impression on me. It traumatised me to some extent but not in the way it does some girls.

What shook me rigid was the fact that I CAME when I was being raped.

It was the BEST fucking orgasm of my life!

That made me think and eventually realise all the feminist stuff I'd been thinking was plain wrong.

Girls aren't meant to be like the feminists want us to be.

We were meant to be submissive and not to try and rule the world.

I'm thinking of starting up a new blog where I can create my ideal fantasy society.

In it, us girls will be how I feel in my heart we ought to be and how in my wild dark fantasies I wish I was already being.

Anyone think it's a good idea or am I just talking out of my arse like usual?

Saturday 4 June 2011

Are women human?


Are women human?

Are women human? At first sight this looks like a strange question even to ask. But I'll ask it just the same because the answer isn't anywhere near as obvious as you might think.

Remember that article I posted by scientists? The latest research shows that females are more closely related to apes than men are.

Weird, right?

So are we human or are we apes?

Point 1 - the evidence of science - seems to suggest that we're either not human or at least not as human as Men. Girls are closer genetically to apes than men are and are therefore at least less human than men; if not purely animal and not human at all.

Point 2 - A girl in Florida shot herself in the head with a .44 and survived with barely a scratch on her. If a man had done that his brains would be splattered all over the place! It just goes to show that expressions like "empty headed slut" or "brainless bimbo" are the literal TRUTH and NOT just figures of speech. So if girls can shoot themselves in the head and still live there must be only a minute amount of brain matter inside their skulls

Point 3 – Women’s brains are smaller than men – on average they have around 98% fewer brain cells than men. (No wonder that stupid bitch in Florida didn’t manage to kill herself!)

Point 4 – The Bible tells us that girls don’t even have souls. Here’s the evidence:

Landover Baptist Creation Scientist, Dr. Jonathan Edwards, announced findings related to his research into the female soul early this week. "The absence of either salvation or condemnation for women finds extensive support in the Word of God." He reported. "Jesus said that the sole reason God created women in the first place was to provide company and service to men (1 Corinthians 11:9), God determined that men would be lonely living alone, so he created women purely to keep men company and serve their needs (Genesis 2:18-22). Women are therefore completely subordinate to men (1 Corinthians 11:3). It stands to reason, though, that once men enter the Kingdom of Heaven, they will be one with God, and will no longer be lonely and in need of mortal companionship. Thus, the reason behind having women will no longer exist. Women, like the members of the animal kingdom, will fall by the wayside."

Dr. Edwards went on to say that, "once men reunite with their maker, they will no longer be burdened with the care of women. After all, women were inferior creations from the start. Women are fond of self-indulgence (Isaiah 32:9-11). They are silly and easily led into error (2 Timothy 3:6). They are subtle and deceitful (Proverbs 7:10; Ecclesiastes 7:26). They are zealous in promoting superstition and idolatry (Jeremiah 7:18; Ezekiel 13:17, 23). And they are active in instigating to iniquity (Numbers 31:15-16; 1 Kings 21:25; Nehemiah 13:26). It was the inherent weakness of women that led them to be deceived by Satan (Genesis 3:1-6; 2 Corinthians 11:3; 1 Timothy 2:14). Consequently, women were cursed from the start (Genesis 3:16). There is simply no room in heaven for such flawed and inadequate beings."

So women are genetically closer to apes, have smaller brains than men, have a smaller parietal cortex (associated with visual and spatial perception and capacity for reasoning and abstract thought), and they don’t even have souls according to the Bible.

All round, it looks pretty much as if us girls aren't  human but just a slightly higher form of ape.

I’ve known for years that we were inferior to men but now it looks very much as if we aren’t even HUMAN BEINGS at all!