Saturday, 21 June 2014

Is 'consent' relevant to sexual activity?

Is 'consent' relevant to sexual activity?

Feminists are fond of saying that only around 3% of men who are brought to trial and charged with rape are convicted. In their eyes that's proof of some kind of sinister conspiracy against women and proof that the law is on the side of rapists and against 'rape victims.'

It never seems to occur to them that the men who are accused of rape are generally acquitted for one of the following reasons:

1  The man didn't have sex with the girl (in other words, he's innocent)
2  The sex between them was consensual (in other words, he's innocent)
3  The girl's account wasn't credible for various reasons (in other words, she's lying or confused or mistaken)

Now the first reason for acquittal is obvious and the ONLY reason why that happens is either a mistaken identity by the girl or, more commonly, deliberate lying on her part.

That doesn't stop feminists objecting even to the acquittal of completely innocent men. A lunatic college professor even said that it did male students who were falsely accused of rape good because it made them wonder if they MIGHT have wanted to rape a woman.

Talk about twisted logic!

Now let's look at the issue of consent.

Under British law one aspect of the parts dealing with sexual offences is that sexual activity is lawful in itself except where there is an 'absence of consent.' This is interpreted in widely different ways by different lawyers and judges and their take on it ranges from demanding active consent at all stages of sexual activity, regarding the question of whether or not the person accused of rape or sexual assault knew that the other party had not consented, examining the question of tacit or implied consent and the capacity of a person to consent to sexual activity.

The law defines the 'absence of consent' in two ways - the first is when explicit consent to sex hasn't been given and the second is when the person consenting is presumed in law not to have the capacity to consent (the most obvious examples are children or women who are drunk or drugged or asleep).

Further refinements of the law come in the thorny areas of belief and knowledge. For instance the law states that rape 'must have the intention to effect the prohibited sexual penetration with the knowledge that it occurs without the consent of the victim.'

So straight away there are obvious problems. Let's list the most immediate ones.

1 The man must KNOW that he's fucking the woman without her consent.
2 The man must NOT believe that she HAS consented but carries on fucking her anyway in full KNOWLEDGE of that fact.
3 The woman MUST have made it obvious to the man that she hadn't consented.
4 The man must have fucked the woman with intent while knowing she hadn't consented.

So if the man - as the law has said on a number of occasions - honestly believes that the woman IS consenting then he CAN'T be found guilty of rape.

And if the man's not SURE - in other words if he thinks she MIGHT be consenting - again he can't be guilty of rape.

And without the conscious INTENTION of fucking her against her will he CAN'T be guilty of rape.

So basically it's the responsibility of the WOMAN at least if she's conscious to make it crystal clear to the man that she DOESN'T want to be fucked because in the absence of that clear demonstration the man CAN'T be guilty of rape.

It follows that if she DOESN'T do that then the man is obviously NOT guilty of rape.

So the entire responsibility for it rests on the WOMAN and NOT on the man for making it totally obvious that she doesn't want him to fuck her.

Unless she sets that down in stone it CAN'T be rape.

So if she DOESN'T make it totally explicit that she's NOT consenting to sex then it can't be rape.

In other words, unless she specifically REFUSES - and makes her refusal clear beyond any kind of reasonable doubt - she is giving at least her TACIT consent to being fucked.

And tacit consent in the eyes of the law is as valid as explicit consent.

It's NOT her consent that needs to be explicit; it's her NON-CONSENT.

Anything short of that IS consent.

So that places the responsibility for establishing consent on the WOMAN and NOT on the man.

That makes the interpretation that a woman who's drunk or drugged and gets fucked has somehow been raped a bit dubious.

The logical conclusion would be that if the woman HASN'T made it obvious that she's not consenting then he CAN'T be guilty of rape. So if she's drunk or drugged and gets fucked has she REALLY been raped?

Or is the fact that she's alone with a man and has CHOSEN to get drunk or drugged ACTUALLy a sign of her CONSENT?

Is her drunken or drugged state actually a ruse on her part to avoid the reputation of being a slut and though the law - rather illogically since it grants tacit consent in other areas of crime and social behaviour - calls it rape is it in fact 'really really rape?'

I can't see how it can be.

But I'll come back to that side of the 'rape laws' later.

In the meantime I'll look at the 'absence of consent' that justifies the feminists in calling rape a crime.

Is even that true?

In the first place I'll post an argument that 'consent in rape cases should be irrelevant.' This is put forward by the feminist writer Catherine MacKinnon. She claims that women 'are so unfree that even if a woman is shown to have given consent to sex, that should never be enough to secure an acquittal.'

In other words, in MacKinnon's eyes even consensual sex IS rape and a woman should be free to accuse a man of rape even though she fucked the man with total consent on both sides. His innocence is 'irrelevant' in her eyes.

So if a strident and extreme misandrist feminist like her thinks that - in her own words - 'consent in rape cases should be irrelevant' - and that 'even if a woman is shown to have given consent to sex' it's still rape then what can you do?

If all consensual sex 'is' rape then all sex is rape.

Which means that whether or not the woman consented is irrelevant.

So if all sex is rape then all sex is a crime.

Or (to take a more normal attitude rather than the feminist nonsense of MacKinnon) NO sex is rape.

Rape not only isn't a crime; it doesn't even EXIST if MacKinnon took her ideas to their logical conclusion.

So instead of trying to criminalise rape MacKinnon should be campaigning for the ABOLITION of the rape laws and the total LEGALISATION of rape!

MacKinnon is quite full of weird and wonderful ideas even by the standards of feminists. One of her brightest 'gems' is the quote: "Whenever I ask 'have you ever been raped', most women answer, 'I don't know,'" MacKinnon said.

So if a woman doesn't KNOW if she's been raped how can she possibly have the nerve to charge a man with rape?

If she is so stupid that she doesn't KNOW the difference between rape and consensual sex how the hell can she possibly go on to cry 'rape?'

I'll deal with another MacKinnon gem when I get to the question about 'capacity to consent.'

But I think I've already done enough to show that the whole idea of 'rape' being a crime is illogical nonsense.

Even so I'll carry on destroying the arguments for the feminist point of view.

What exactly is rape? Rape is either coercive sex - in other words, sex that the woman DIDN'T want and made it CLEAR that she didn't want but the man coerced her in some way (we'll discuss coercion in a minute) - or it's violent sex - sex where not only did the woman NOT want to be fucked but the man used violence against her to subdue her and end her resistance.

Now I can't see how a situation where a woman 'doesn't know' if she was raped or not could possibly be considered violent or even coercive?

Am I missing something or are the women who say 'they don't know' if you ask 'were you raped' just thick as two planks?

And coercion is such a wide term (especially in the way it's deliberately misused by feminists) it's almost meaningless.

MacKinnon for instance thinks that 'women are unequal to men economically, socially, culturally, politically, and in religion' and therefore that all sexual relations between them, however consensual, are inherently coercive.

She goes on to add that 'consent' in the fantasy vision of society she has 'means acquiescence. It means passivity. You can be semi-knocked out. You can be dead in some jurisdictions.' When the interviewer challenged her about her comment on death being 'consensual' MacKinnon responded 'sex with a dead body is necrophilia but it isn't regarded as rape.'

So in her eyes it's impossible for a woman - dead, comatose or alive - to 'consent' to sex.

Well, if she really believes that then she MUST logically support ABOLISHING rape as if a woman CAN'T consent then how can a man fuck her WITHOUT her consent?

Talk about contradictory messages!

Now let's get on down and dirty with the idea about 'capacity to consent.'

If a woman is - as the feminists are always trying to claim - equal to a man in every way (even though men are stronger, cleverer, faster and more capable) then she has an equal 'capacity to consent.'

So if MacKinnon and her mob seriously claim that because of 'patriarchy' she DOESN'T have the 'capacity to consent' then how can a man ever be arrested for rape? If the woman COULDN'T consent, how can the man be charged for having sex with her WITHOUT her consent if she's not CAPABLE of giving consent?

Anyway, the logical conclusion of MacKinnon's argument is that a woman isn't capable of making decisions for herself - on sex or anything else - so basically in HER eyes women are not just incapable of taking any responsibility for their actions but not even really capable of THINKING for themselves.

It always amazes me how much contempt feminists have for women. They look on us as if we're children or even some sort of mentally retarded and completely helpless bunch of wallies who can't do anything.

Another MacKinnon gem shows how deep her contempt for women goes. She says: 'Man fucks woman; subject verb object.'

So in her eyes the woman who gets fucked is just an object!

And she has the nerve to complain about misogyny!

Remember her words 'man fucks woman; subject verb object. Individual consent is beside the point.'

So the only logical conclusion on MacKinnon's 'principles' is that rape CAN'T even exist because a woman 'can't give her consent.'

Women have no 'capacity for consent.'

If that's true then what does it mean?

Surely it means that women are on the same level as objects, pets or at best children?

So in the feminist universe women never grow up!

They can't think for themselves, take decisions on their own or give 'consent' to anything.

Are all feminists stuck in a Victorian timewarp or what?

I'm going to discuss another side of the rape issue in another post.

But I think it's pretty obvious that whichever way you look at it a man CAN'T be guilty of raping a woman!

Sunday, 25 May 2014

Why every girl should learn to be a good cocksucker

Why every girl should learn to be a good cocksucker

OK, I’ve been asked about this question recently so here are some of my random thoughts on the issue. I’ll start by listing some of the main reasons why it’s a good thing for us girls to suck men’s cocks and then talk about attitudes, actions and stuff like that.


Reason number 1 – this should ALWAYS be top of a girl’s list of reasons for doing anything – the man enjoys it when you suck his cock! You are giving him pleasure which is what you’re SUPPOSED to be doing when you’re being fucked or otherwise sexually active with him! So let’s list the many reasons why a girl should dedicate her time to sucking his cock.

1        The man enjoys it!
2        Keeps his cock hard!
3        Reduces the risk of colon cancer
4        Reduces the risk of erectile dysfunction and premature ejaculation
5        Remind you he’s always the boss
6        Slightly degrading which makes you remember to show proper humility
7        More likely to make him stay with you
8        Sperm is high in protein!
9        Reduces wrinkles - sucking cock is the best form of facial exercise there is and will reduce wrinkles and keep your jaw from sagging
10    Good for your teeth – sucking his cock stimulates saliva which fights germs, prevents bad breath, fights tooth decay and gum disease
11    Reduces stress – semen contains cortisol, a hormone that is known to reduce stress
12    Prevents insomnia – sperm contains the natural soporific agent melatonin which will help you sleep easily!
13    Makes you feel good and happy – spunk has two chemicals, estrone and oxytocin, that are known to make your mood more cheerful. It also contains thyrotropin which is a natural anti-depressant.
14    Reduces the risk of breast cancer – the glycoprotein and selenium in spunk will reduce the risk of breast cancer.
15    No pregnancies – of course you can’t get pregnant from sucking cock! (Though the decision on pregnancy/contraception/abortion should always be the man’s decision. As I put it in a slogan about a year or so ago, ‘her body, his choice!’
I’m sure there are lots of other good reasons why us girls should always be keen and enthusiastic
cocksuckers but those will do for starters!

Now let’s talk about attitudes towards cocksucking. Too many girls seem to think it’s THEIR choice
whether or not to suck cock and whether or not to spit or swallow.

WRONG – it’s always the MAN’S choice what he gets to put inside your mouth!

(Just as it’s his choice what he does with any other part of your body!)

So a girl should approach cocksucking as her duty and as something that’s pleasurable for the man and
helps to keep her properly humble. When a man’s thrusting inside your mouth and filling it with his seed a
girl should be grateful, humble and totally submissive to his demands. She should recognise that having
his prick inside her mouth is an honour and being allowed to taste his spunk is a huge honour.

So how to go about it? Here are a few suggestions.

1 Get on your knees while you're sucking his cock. It's uncomfortable for you but very pleasurable for him which is all that matters. A lot of men like to use your back as a footrest while you're sucking their cock which also adds to the element of humiliation that reinforces the humility us girls OUGHT to feel in the situation.
2 Remember the whole business is all about HIM and about HIS pleasure. Let HIM control the pace and always be in charge. If he wants to fuck your mouth gently let him; if he wants to fuck it hard, banging your face and mouth against his cock, using your ears or hair as handholds, that’s fine. It’s HIS choice how he decides he wants to fuck your mouth – NOT yours!
3 Don’t even THINK about spitting out his cum. He’s doing you an HONOUR by cumming inside your mouth and spitting it out is being rude, disrespectful and rejecting him which is just not on under any circumstances. Let HIM decide what he wants to do with his spunk.
4 If he wants to cum on your face, let him. That’s degrading for a girl and the humiliation of it is pleasurable for him.
5 If he wants you to swallow his spunk, let him. It’s always HIS decision and never yours!
6 Don’t forget to kiss his balls as part of the process.
7 When he’s finished clean his cock and balls with your tongue and mouth. Make sure you get every last bit of spunk off his prick.

Remember at all times that HE is in control and when you suck his cock you are making a conscious and open sign of your submission to his superior male equipment.

And never forget – there are only a few purposes for which a female’s mouth is intended.


Number one is sucking a man’s cock and that is more important than ANY of the other things our mouths do!

Tuesday, 15 April 2014

What sort of roles should we have?

Over the last few years I've noticed a lot of different ideas on how men and women should be. Relationships, work, home life, dress, behaviour in public, legal status, education and sexuality are some of the areas where there seems to be huge disagreement.

I'm going to ignore the various schools of feminism becase I assume that no one here believes in them. We all I assume broadly accept the idea of male headship of families and male leadership of society.

But beyond that I sense different approaches to gender issues, the organisation of societ and questions of dress and behaviour. There also seems to be a divide between people who are mainly orientated towards a BDSM-tpe sexual relationship and don't go beyond that and those who genuinely want to establish a patriarchal society.

Even among the supporters of patriarchy there are differences of degree, emphasis and approach. The role of men and women isn't seen identically even by that group of people. Some want a sort of 1950s housewife type of set-up, others want a more hard approach where the sexual rights of the male outweigh the possible lack of enthusiasm of the female to an absolute and unqualified degree, some believe that domestic discipline is essential, and some look on females as less than human - at best a lower species of animal and at worst an object to be used.

So are we 'angels in the house' to be supported financially, treated like children or pets, our role seen as housewife and mother and cook and cleaner? Or are we sex objects to be fucked and used and nothing else about us matters? Or what?

Of course as a writer of many BDSM stories and a lot of articles and other posts I've sometimes written satire, sometimes fantasy and sometimes written how I really feel and think about things. And I'm not sure that even my own positions are necessarily consistent.

There are certain areas where I feel absolutely sure about the right way to think and act and the right direction that society should be taking. On the other hand there are others where I'm not sure at all or even where I find myself more in sympathy with women than men.

And there are whole aspects of life where I really feel that it's almost impossible to correct an injustice in one place without creating an equal injustice in others.

And of course there are different attitudes towards what both men and women feel is the right way to behave. Look at the thorny issue of the niqab/burkha - is a woman who wears one being submissive or not? Many Muslim feminists claim that to wear this garment does NOT mean that you are accepting male headship.

Anyway let's leave that specific issue aside and concentrate on more general aspects. How SHOULD women dress? Like nuns, like Doris Day or like sluts? Or does it depend - on the time and place and situation, on the individual relationship?

I have a marriage where my Husband has very definite ideas about how He wants me to dress. As those of you who know my blogs and groups and stories and other articles I've posted elsewhere know by now, in my case He wants me to dress like a total slut most of the time and only dress in a more 'modest' style at, say, parents' evenings at school or that sort of thing. But should there be general rules on dress? Or is it an area where different Masters will have different ideas?

A related area is modesty of speech. I think it's a given that we should be polite and respectful to Gentlemen but what about the way we speak? Is dirty talking out, only for the bedroom/relationship situations or can - maybe even should - us girls be foul-mouthed and swear like troopers all the time?

Another area of conflict is in the field of work. Should the husband work and support a stay-at-home wife? Or is that not just old-fashioned but economically unrealistic with the strains on people's incomes these days?

On purely sexual matters I think it's more simple on the whole. Girls really do have a duty to let men fuck them; going out on a date IS an implied contract where sex is on offer by the girl at the end of it; and IMO it's totally ridiculous to think that a husband, partner or boyfriend could POSSIBLY be guilty of 'rape.'

Date rape just ISN'T rape in any meaningful sense of the word.

It's a contract where the girl implicitly accepts that the man will want to fuck her and if she refuses at the end of the date then she's broken the contract and only SHE has done anything wrong.

If he DID decide to rape her when she acts like that then it's her own fault and she's only got herself to blame for what happened to her.

In the same way I think that if a girl gets pregnant - whether through a relatonship or through rape - then ONLY the father of her unborn child should have the right to decide on whether or not she keeps the baby or has an abortion. The woman should have NO say in the matter whatsoever. It should be purely the man's decision.

As I put it in a slogan on a feminist message board where I went along to wind them up, 'her body; his choice.'

If a girl is in a relationship - marriage, partnership or boyfriend - equally she's entered into a contract where the man has the right to decide if and when to use contraception; if and when and how they have sex; if and when she can have an abortion; and every aspect of her sexuality should be controlled by him.

I could say a lot more but this post is already too long so I'll sit down and write part two!





Thursday, 28 November 2013

The nature of being female - part five

OK, i've written at some length about our cunts and (in a previous post) our tits. Now it's time to look at a girl's arse.

One thing that's immediately obvious is that both males and females have an arse. So what makes ours different from theirs?

In the first place it's designed to shit just like a Man's is but it's also wider, flabbier and looser. Why is that? There are many reasons and i'll go into them in a minute.

To begin with we've already seen why raping a girl's cunt is always a good thing even for her. So what about raping her arse? What are the reasons why that is a good thing?

Her arsehole is tighter than her cunt so it will hurt more
It's degrading and humiliating and the association of her arsehole with shit reinforces that feeling
If you rape her arse right it will be agony for her to sit down afterwards
It reinforces the Male superior/female inferior thing in a very direct and forceful way
If a Man doesn't want to get the girl pregnant fucking her up the arse is about 99.9% certain NOT to lead to pregnancy
The Man's in charge because the girl can't trick Him into making her pregnant (or do much else to be honest!)
The tightness of a girl's arsehole arouses Men
He feels powerful and she feels powerless
It helps to keep her humble
The arsehole is tighter. And it's sexier because of the taboo, and the pain involved.
The proximity of the cunt to the arse reminds both Him and Her that it's a female being used
It's get less hair than around the cunt region (unless you shave it off completely)

Now from the female point of view:

It's painful but also pleasurable
It's relaxing and not only your arse muscles but your whole body gets relaxed
A girl's arsehole is more sensitive than her cunt so she'll feel both the pain and pleasure more intensely

And, of course, if you enjoy the feeling of being degraded and in pain you'll enjoy being fucked up the arse!

All in all being fucked or (even better) raped up the arse is a powerful reminder of why we ARE inferior, property, just objects to be used and just three-holed twats with bodies designed perfectly for Male pleasure.

In my next post i'll examine sucking cocks and how that too defines a female.

Saturday, 9 November 2013

Intelligence in females

In an earlier post i briefly touched on the fact that a girl's brain is connected directly to her cunt. Her brain is also smaller than a Man's and is easily aroused by stimulating or penetrating her cunt.

It's no accident that with some exceptions Men are more intelligent than females. They have a cock and balls while we only have a cunt.

All our thinking, feeling, sensations and other brain processes are totally defined and dominated by the fact that we HAVE a cunt.

And it's no accident that one of the most frequent Male insult is 'you stupid cunt!' Real Men know instinctively that a cunt is associated INHERENTLY with stupidity and that females, HAVING cunts, are (with a few minor exceptions) always MORE stupid than Men.

So when a Man calls a girl a stupid cunt He's not just insulting her (though of course He's doing that too) but He's reminding her that the SOURCE of her stupidity is BECAUSE she's a female, simply BECAUSE she has a cunt.

So simply through the fact of being born with a cunt rather than a Manly cock and balls nature condemns us to a lifetime of stupidity, at least in comparison with the majority of Men.

Some of it's DNA as well; in any successful or clever female you can always see Masculine traits and if you analysed their DNA girls like that would have an extra Male chromosome just as wimpish men have an extra female one. But we're talking at the most optimistic estimate no more than 5% of females. The rest of us really ARE stupid fucking cunts.

So accepting that we ARE inherently stupid just BECAUSE we've got a cunt, how should we think, feel and act in the light of that knowledge?

Obviously we should stop even trying to compete with Men because we're inferior and stupid and bound to fail. WE should stop demanding equal rights when we're obviously NOT equal to Men. Instead of trying to take charge of situations we should ask Men for help and leadership. Rather than demanding 'rights' we should start fulfilling our duties. We should accept Male leadership and simply try to fulfil our purpose in life, to serve Men and to be fucked or otherwise used by them for their pleasure.

All those are essential changes both externally and internally. How should us girls think and feel about ourselves knowing that our cunt dooms us to a life of irretrievable stupidity and failure?

Well, there are several ways of reacting to that realisation.

One is the futile feminist road of denial and simply blaming female stupidity on 'lack of opportunity' or 'the patriarchy.'

Since it's obvious bollocks i'm not even going to waste any time dissing THAT crock of shit!

Another is to accept it grudgingly, resent the fact and at best try to minimise its effects. That tends to lead to mental confusion and an unfocused female who falls between two stools and isn't much good to anyone.

Then there's the 'consensual submissive' way, a contradiction in terms if ever there was one. Since by definition submission MEANS total surrender to the will of another, how 'consent' comes into that is beyond me. That's just for people who play at submission and just look on it as a sexual turn-on rather than grasping the fact that it applies in EVERY aspect of life and NOT just in sex.

And of course there's nature's way, to accept and embrace our own natural inferiority, stupidity, incapacity and utter fucking helplessness without the leadership and Ownership of a Man.

The caption to a cartoon i posted on my JPU forum illustrates the truth in a humorous way. Two females are talking and one says to the other:

'They say men think with their penises.'

The other girl answers: 'That must be why women are so stupid.'

Many a true word is said in jest and that cartoon which i found somewhere on the web is no exception. Men think with their cock and balls which makes them smart and clever; girls think with their cunt which makes them slow and stupid.

So the next time a Man tells you that you're a stupid fucking cunt you should accept and embrace His criticism of you.

After all, that really IS all that we are!

Thursday, 7 November 2013

The nature of being female - part four

What i am is SIMPLY (more or less - i'll come on to what else we are at the end of this post) a cunt. As a female what i am is what i have - a dirty cunt that hangs uselessly between my legs. It humiliates me and because i have a cunt i don't have the same kind of sexuality that Men do. A Man has a strong and powerful cock with balls that thrust and penetrate and take me. As a girl i only have a cunt. Because i have a cunt i have NO rights, no capabilities, nothing. No freedom, no sense of worth, nothing. A total zero and all because i have a cunt. i'm a female, born with a cunt between my legs instead of a strong Manly prick and the balls that go with it.

Being female is an insult in itself. Real Men know that and insult other men by calling them girls or women or pussies or anything that suggests that the other man is NOT a REAL Man but someone who DOESN'T have a cock and balls but only a cunt.

So of course i AM a cunt. i'm a girl, a woman, a female. Yes, it's true; i don't have a cock or balls, i only have tits and a cunt. And of course reminding me that BECAUSE i have a cunt i AM a cunt is deeply humiliating and yet a perfectly fair and accurate way of reminding me of the inherent Male dominance over me simply BECAUSE of their equipment and my lack of it.

So i've got tits and a cunt and because i've got those things that defines me as female and therefore inferior. Because i've got a cunt I AM a cunt. And it's quite right to call me a cunt, a bitch, a slut, a whore, a tart, a slag, a cow, a slapper, a bimbo because simply BECAUSE i've got a cunt i AM all those things.

Having a cunt means to me that i'm always in second place in society, in gender relations, in education, in jobs, in life, in sexual activity and just in every way there is. All because i have a cunt. All i am is a hole to be penetrated by a Man and just having a cunt means that's what my role in life actually is. The mere fact that i've got inferior genitals makes me inherently inferior and inherently put on this earth to be used by Men.

So OK, what exactly am i saying? Am i saying that we should be ashamed of having a cunt? Yes, in a way, but that doesn't mean i wish i didn't have one or i wish i was a Man. To be honest i enjoy my cunt and think it's good that it can help to please Men by being fucked. But in every aspect of life having a cunt does bring with it certain inherent consequences and maybe at times us girls aren't fully aware of what they mean.

Let's look at the physical aspects of being born with a cunt. A girl's cunt is soft, open, wet, easily available, a hole that's placed between our legs to get penetrated and fucked and it's an inherently submissive part of our body that was designed by nature for the specific purpose of giving Men pleasure by fucking us. We also bleed once a month which is a big pain and yet again we see how nature endowed us with an inferior status in life. We are also born to be the baby carriers of the world and heave around future children inside us for nine months. (i've had three now so i know what i'm talking about!)

Now let's look at the psychological aspects of having a cunt. It means we're programmed biologically to have babies, to expect to be fucked and to be submissive towards Men. It's because i have a cunt that i am a mother, a fuck-toy and a female submissive. It's because i have a cunt that i was born to give pleasure to Men. Because of my cunt i'm inferior to Men and my own sexual identity is simply that of a vessel in which Men empty their sperm. This is what having a cunt means on the sexual level - to have no right to any pleasure of my own but simply to experience sexual pleasure through being used by Men for their sexual pleasure. It's the Man who uses me who defines my sexuality and my sexual identity. Sex is not a free choice on my part; it's not something over which i have any control or choice. Being fucked is something that happens TO me and NOT something i initiate or control. It's certainly NOT for my pleasure that a Man fucks me; it's not about me or about me benefiting from it. A Man fucks me for HIS pleasure and that's what it's all about. Sex, fucking, rape, bondage, humiliation and all the other aspects of my sexuality belong to me only in a passive sense; i'm the object, the receiver, the hole that's used. And i always WILL experience sex like that and i SHOULD always experience sex like that simply because i have a cunt.

It's obvious if i look at my cunt how malformed it is when compared with the Male equipment. It's smaller, the clitoris is a failed attempt at a female cock, it's open and defenceless compared with the protective covering for the Male; and it's just inferior as a tool to the Man's equipment in every way. That doesn't mean a cunt is useless or contemptible; apart from pissing out of it a cunt also has its most primitive and primordial use in being fucked. It's what it's meant for; it reinforces on every level my own inferiority as a mere female. In sex as in life Men are superior and we were put there to serve them and to be used for their pleasure. And our cunt is proof of that assessment in itself. A cunt is just an object to be used by Men, a hole to be filled by them and other than that it's useless.

With one exception - being the delivery channel for new life. Femininity is absolutely biologically hardwired into our bodies and nowhere more so than in the experience of pregnancy and birth. Men fuck us and if we're lucky we get pregnant and the Man leaves us to carry the burden about for nine months. A lot of the time the discomfort and problems caused by pregnancy are almost unbearable and we can barely function to an extent. And then there's the contractions, the labour pains, the whole horrifically painful process of giving birth. Sure, you can have a Caesarean which at least makes the actual process of birth less traumatic. But speaking as a Mum who's had three kids the natural way and would never even consider a Caesarean i think that the whole experience of natural birth also teaches us girls some fundamentally important lessons about life.

In the first place there's the whole burden of pregnancy - physical and psychological. It's uncomfortable and often actually painful and it also leads to wild mood swings as hormones in the body get mixed up. Then when you get to the time the baby's due you have agonising pain and suffering all centred around and focused on your cunt. And so we see that the evidence of pregnancy is that nature has designed our cunts from the moment of our births to feel and experience pain. Even the act of bringing new life into the world is painful, degrading and a huge relief when it's over at last. So what that shows is that not only is our cunt designed to be fucked, raped and used by Men but that it's also designed by nature to feel pain. Once again we see that a female is inferior to a Man in every way and that our cunts were designed for their benefit and not for our own.

And if you look at fucking a Man gets immediate and obvious pleasure from it; He gets aroused, shoots His load inside us and then goes on to other things and doesn't give a shit about what He's done. If He's raped us then He'll almost certainly have hurt us as well and yet strangely a girl who IS raped rather than fucked is MORE likely to orgasm (one survey done of 1000 raped girls found ALL had orgasmed; most surveys report figures of around 60% of raped women orgasming. The lowest figures i've seen are 40% of girls who've been raped orgasming. So, once again, the association for a female of sex and pain or at least of painful sex is undeniable.

And even 'consensual' fucking can be painful for the girl especially if the Man has a big prick or she has a small tight cunt. Rough fucking will always be painful for her and rape can be psychologically humiliating as well as painful. So the association between being fucked and experiencing pain is pretty constant. And that's just if you're fucked up the cunt - being fucked up the arse can be VERY painful and even sucking a Man's cock doesn't give a girl any pleasure though it does the Man which of course is what's important.

And if you ARE hurt during sex it's almost ecstatic to feel the soreness of your cunt and the swelling of your labia. To be fucked roughly or to be raped gives an extra frisson of pain and humiliation and discomfort to the experience which once again shows our natural inferiority because it HEIGHTENS our sexual experience and nature obviously DESIGNED us girls so that we WOULD feel more sexual satisfaction if our fucking was combined with a touch of pain.

So it reinforces the truth that my wet and bruised cunt is utterly vulnerable, useless and incapable of self-defence and all it can do is to undergo pain, rough and degrading fucking or brutal rape and there is absolutely NOTHING that i can do about it.

Having a cunt is an outward and visible sign of our inferiority and it's degrading in itself. It's a constant reminder that the gaping hole between your legs is the SOLE reason you ARE inferior, the SOLE reason you're NOTHING, the SOLE reason you deserve nothing better than being used by a Man for His pleasure and that you have NO value and you mean NOTHING to Him. All you are is a female, a woman, a girl, a member of the second sex, the lower sex, the useless and worthless sex. And you belong to that weaker and lower sex simply BECAUSE you have a cunt.

Because you have a cunt you are weak, stupid, not even human. All you are is an object to be used and property to be owned by a Man. A Man feels power and enjoyment in His dominant sexual pleasure while you can feel only the sense of being an object that He uses to bring Himself pleasure, a vessel to carry His sperm, incubate and give birth to His child. All that you are is a cunt with a body attached to it, nothing more. It is your role in life to serve Him and be used by Him simply because you have a cunt. It's your role in life to be called a slut, a bitch, a cunt, a cow, a slag, a slapper, a hussy, a whore or bimbo and you knoe in your heart and mind - and especially in your cunt - that all those things He says about you are true and true just BECAUSE you have a cunt. All you are is His slave simply because you have a cunt.

So is that all there is to us? We're just our cunts and nothing else?

Well, almost; about 90% of us IS defined simply by our cunt.

But we've also (when we reach puberty) got tits and we also have an arse and gob.

We are (as a Gentleman recently said to me) just three-holed twats with tits.

And that really DOES define us completely.

i've already written in another post about how our tits define us and what their proper purpose and use is so in the next section i'll deal with our arses and in the one after that our gobs.

The nature of being female - Part Three

Part Three

Having shown how what DEFINES us girls and makes us inherently inferior to Men is simply HAVING a cunt i'm now going to try to explain HOW it is that HAVING a cunt leads inevitably to BEING a cunt.

In the first place we've already seen that science has discovered that the female brain is directly and intimately linked to the cunt and any activity in the cunt directly stimulates and gives pleasure to the brain.

We also know that the cunt, like a girl's tits, is specifically designed by nature to give pleasure to Men when they use it.

It follows that the greatest possible stimulation of the female occurs when a girl is being fucked. The obvious conclusion is that she will be more intelligent by being fucked and that fucking her cunt is the best way to impart superior Male Truth inside her.

We also know from science that a girl who is raped rather than 'consensually' fucked or 'made love to' will experience a HIGHER degree of stimulation and be MORE alert during and after the experience and therefore rape is the most effective tool for educating and training females.

We also know from science that a girl who is raped will orgasm while with 'consensual' fucking and 'lovemaking' she hardly ever does so actually the rapist is giving the girl PLEASURE by raping her.

A cunt was designed and destined to be fucked, used and yes, raped by Men. Rape is the norm in the animal kingdom and SHOULD be among human females too.

So a girl who's a virgin will LESS intelligent and LESS happy than a girl who gets fucked regularly; a girl who gets fucked 'consensually' will be LESS intelligent and LESS happy than a girl who gets raped.

So rape makes you more intelligent AND happier!

The problem is that most of the time one of the following things is going wrong.

1 Her cunt isn't being used at all
2 Her cunt isn't being used enough
3 Her cunt isn't being used in the right way
4 Her cunt is being used selfishly

The first point is obvious; if the girl's a virgin all her life she'l never get to experience Male Truth. She'll always be stupid and she'll never find happiness.

The second point is also fairly obvious. If a girl isn't getting fucked often enough she'll always be pretty stupid, full of ignorance and lies and miserable most of her life.

The third is complex. What exactly are right and wrong (or at least better and worse) ways of using a cunt?

It's obvious that a cunt was designed to be fucked so by definition lesbianism is a WRONG use of a cunt. Since we also know that rape is superior to 'consensual' fucking we can make the stronger claim that a cunt is not only designed to be fucked by Men but specifically to be RAPED by them. Just as lesbianims is a WRONG use of a cunt, rape is the RIGHT use of it. As rape is the best way of using a cunt we can also deduce that 'consensual' fucking and 'lovemaking' are WRONG ways of using a cunt.

Selfish ways of using a cunt include masturbation and cunnilingus. If a Man is raping a girl's cunt He's fulfilling its
true biological destiny; if a girl is just frigging herself off or, even worse, having her count tongued by a dyke or (worse still) a Gentleman then he cunt is being used in a SELFISH way purely for her own gratification. With rape it's different; the girl's cunt is being used PROPERLY to give pleasure to the Man raping her but by doing so He ALSO gives her pleasure.

Once again i come back to the fundamental truth that females are defined primarily by their cunts

We HAVE a cunt; that DEFINES us AS a cunt.